That our name makes some readers uneasy at first blush
demonstrates that words and phrases and ideas have histories just as
much as nations and cities have histories. Our name would have been
almost meaningless a thousand years ago, uncontroversial four hundred
years ago, yet sets some people’s teeth on edge in the twenty-first
century. For a brief discussion about what Christian Humanism means, we
invite you to listen to episode one of The Christian Humanist Podcast at
your leisure. Until that leisure materializes, we can say a few things
about our brand of Christian Humanism here:
- We’re Humanists in the Renaissance sense. Borrowing the Latin word humanitas from
Cicero and other classical writers, the Italian Renaissance humanists
and later Erasmus of Rotterdam (whose picture is on the left on our
site’s banner) borrowed that Roman idea of disciplined education as a
program to reform and reinvigorate the Church and European culture,
opposing what they perceived as the strict limits of Scholastic thought
and the elitism that grew out of its schools and practices while most of
Europe remained illiterate. Embracing learning from the modern and
postmodern secular academy and dedicating ourselves to teaching what we
learn to any who will be taught, reserving judgment on this or that
school of thought’s adequacy or inadequacy to reality as experienced and
revealed, we twenty-first-century Christian Humanists proceed with the
conviction that good ideas will resonate with the faithful intellect,
bad ideas will prove their wretchedness in the fires of critical
conversation, and those scholars and saints who have gone before us
likely held up as important the books and ideas they held up for some
reason; it’s for us to taste and see, not throw ideas out before we
taste.
- We’re friends in the Aristotelian sense. As you
read this site and listen to our podcast (and we hope you do both),
you’ll notice that each of us has certain scholarly interests,
philosophical tendencies, and favorite topics of thought that differ
from the others. Read a while longer and you might suspect that each of
us thinks that the other two get certain things very wrong. That’s why we keep talking.
We believe that one of the highest sorts of friendship is the sort that
seeks excellence together, and one way that we do so is to pound on
each other’s ideas until the weak ones break. While we hope not to
congratulate ourselves for being ecumenical or open-minded or any of
those sorts of things, we do hope that, by listening to one another,
we’re acting out an acknowledgment of our own limitations, and further
we submit to the possibility that in the course of things we might learn
something from the questions at hand and from one another.
- We’re intellectuals in the Dantean sense. In the Florentine poet’s great Comedy,
what separates the saved from the damned is not merely circumstances of
birth or desire to do good but properly oriented loves. The souls in
Limbo certainly suffer in some sense from being born out of season, and
certain souls seem to have been despairing even before they ended up in Inferno,
but what marks their fate and shapes their punishments is the way that
they began to satisfy the desires of the flesh without the checks of
duty and order, to seek power without responsibility to God, to exercise
the wiles of the mind without a love for the truth. And those in Paradiso
come before the Pilgrim grouped according to the baptized desires that
defined their lives, whether for the goods of scholarship as framed by
revelation, the goods of justice as framed by God’s sovereignty, or the
goods of contemplation as given to the faithful by a faithful God. We
believe that the intellect is a good gift from God, one inadequate to
save the soul but nonetheless a good gift. And our exercise of that
intellect is itself an act of worship of the God of Abraham, Isaac,
Jacob, and Jesus.
- We’re Christians in the broadest sense. David and
Michial are disciples of the Magesterial Reformation, and Nathan claims
influences from the Anabaptists. Michial is a Christian existentialist,
and although Nathan is almost convinced, David isn’t quite as sure.
Every one of us loves Augustine for a very different reason. Each of
the three of us serves a local congregation in different ways and in
different capacities, and none of us is convinced that the books the
others most often cite are worth citing. Yet our confession of Jesus as
the Christ we hold in common, and our podcast conversations and blog
posts begin from within the broad but intelligible tradition that we
call Christianity.
Additionally, our introduction states that we aim to be
“unapologetically confessional, unabashedly intellectual . . . taking
the question at hand seriously and ourselves not at all.” We put a good
amount of thought into that introduction and believe that it sums up our
mission very well:
- Unapologetically confessional. We believe that
denominations, creeds, and doctrine are important and that the
differences between Christian groups are nearly as important as the
beliefs that tie us all together. Additionally, we believe in the truth
of the historical Christian message over and against the doctrines of
other religions and philosophies.
- Unabashedly intellectual. We believe that
Christianity has nothing to fear from sustained inquiry and that the
truth will always survive whatever attacks it undergoes in the
Marketplace of Ideas. (The metaphor, not the podcast.)
- Taking the question at hand seriously… The things
we discuss on our podcast and in our blog entries are important to us,
and we seek to treat the questions and the informed answers others have
given with the utmost delicacy and respect.
- …and ourselves not at all. There is no room in the
Christian life–not even the Christian academic life!–for ego, and we
make an effort to use as much self-deprecating humor as we and our
listeners can tolerate.
Though we know that CHP listeners are smart enough to know this
already, we do want to make public that the views and opinions stated on
the Christian Humanist Podcast are the hosts’ ideas and do not
necessarily reflect the official positions of the University of Georgia,
Emmanuel College, or any other institution with which the hosts
participate, including but not limited to congregations, denominations,
Modern Language Associations, or other affiliations. We also might
change our minds about certain things–we do believe that mortals are
always learning, after all.
All prior episodes of the podcast are available in .mp3 format on the
“Episodes” page, but we’d prefer if folks would subscribe via iTunes or
by copying and pasting our RSS address in the right margins. Likewise
with the blog, except click the “Blog” or “Subscribe to Blog” links.
Links to show notes and to discussions of the post elsewhere on the
Internet will also appear in each episode’s archive entry.
No comments:
Post a Comment